About Us

Why is Neil Postman still relevant in the modern era?

I had followed academics who supported television during some of its early years while I was in graduate school. It was a challenge to those who thought of television as a source of liberation, agency, and power to the viewer. His claim that watching television constitutes idolatry was a daring challenge to academics who work in this field. It was a lesson to not only apply to Huxley’s novel but to Postman’s argument as well. On the other hand, Postman contended that although television might have made the government more accessible in some ways, it did so by fostering an environment in which Postman’s claim regarding television was startling, even if we had been raised in a time of mass society studies.

Additionally, they demonstrated how the rise of public affairs programming on television could fulfill a crucial civic duty by increasing the government’s responsiveness to the people. ” Even if we had been trained in an age of mass society studies, Postman’s argument about television was jarring. Postman disagreed with McLuhan’s assertion that His strong beliefs about what constitutes a ” But he was still comfortable using terms like “idolatry” to describe a bias toward one medium over another.

In many respects, Postman’s discussion of television culture influenced the work of later television and popular culture scholars. It undoubtedly compelled academics studying media and communication to look at how culture affects how audiences use and interpret media. He is relevant not because he has all the answers, but rather because he teaches us to ask better questions that respect our focus, memory, and capacity for wonder. Yes, we inherit media ecologies, but we can also take care of them, trim them, and occasionally even plant new ones.

Decades later, reading it again was like running into an old friend who had not changed, but I had. Postman offers a third approach – thoughtful stewardship – in a time when discussions about technology frequently veer between utopian hype and dystopian panic. Not as a relic, but as a mentor who recognized that the most significant technologies aren’t the ones we create, but rather the mental habits we develop while using them. Nevertheless, his cool, inquisitive voice continued to pierce the cacophony with caution rather than urgency.

He perseveres because of this. He emphasizes that although we are not helpless, tools are never neutral. Furthermore, that kind of wisdom never goes out of style in a world that is constantly striving for the next upgrade. Today’s political discourse frequently devolves into Twitter threads and slogans. The latter, neil postman books claimed, was more accurate.